What crime has Walton committed?
On September 22, 2017, after a four-week trial, the jury found Defendant Keith Marvel Walton guilty of the following charges: (1) aiding and abetting or conspiring with others to commit Hobbs Act robbery at Westime in West Hollywood, California (“the Westime robbery”); (2) aiding and abetting or conspiring with others …
What standard of proof is generally required to establish an aggravating circumstance?
It is also the standard of proof by which the defendant must prove affirmative defenses or mitigating circumstances in civil or criminal court. In civil court, aggravating circumstances also only have to be proven by a preponderance of the evidence, as opposed to beyond reasonable doubt (as in criminal court).
Why is stare decisis the preferred course?
Stare decisis is the preferred course because it promotes the evenhanded, predictable, and consistent development of legal principles, fosters reliance on judicial decisions, and contributes to the actual and perceived integrity of the judicial process.
What makes an Offence aggravated?
The Crime and Disorder Act 1998 provides that a specific aggravated offence is committed if it involves racial or religious hostility. then it may be appropriate to charge only the one aggravated offence, (together with the ‘basic’ offence in the alternative if considered appropriate).
Are there any major Court cases concerning the 6th Amendment?
Wingo, 407 U.S. 514 (1972), was a United States Supreme Court case involving the Sixth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, specifically the right of defendants in criminal cases to a speedy trial.
What was the vote in Gideon v Wainwright?
Wainwright, case in which the U.S. Supreme Court on March 18, 1963, ruled (9–0) that states are required to provide legal counsel to indigent defendants charged with a felony.
What are the 3 alternative circumstances?
Alternative circumstances are those which must be taken into consideration as aggravating or mitigating according to the nature and effects of the crime and the other conditions attending its commission. They are the relationship, intoxication and the degree of instruction and education of the offender.
When can Intoxication be considered as a mitigating circumstance?
— Under Article 15, intoxication is mitigating when it is not habitual or intentional, that is, not subsequent to the plan to commit the crime.